Equivalence of guarantees: a prerequisite for changing loan insurance.

Legislation has paved the way for mobility in loan insurance, but competition between banks and insurers is based on one crucial element: the equivalence of guarantees. If this condition is met, the change in borrower insurance is only a matter of timing.

Competition established since 2010

Competition established since 2010

Since 2010, the Lagarde law allows a borrower not to blindly choose the group contract offered by his bank to insure his home loan. It can in fact bring competition into play by favoring the individual contract of an insurer. This is called delegation insurance. This legislative provision aims to reduce the cost of borrower insurance, and it was reinforced in 2014 by the Hamon law and then in 2018 by the Bourquin amendment to the Sapin 2 law.

But what remained unchanged was the condition of the equivalence of the guarantees registered in article L, 312-9 of the Lagarde law. It authorizes the lending institution to refuse a request for delegation of insurance if the individual contract offered by the organization does not have a level of guarantee equivalent to that of the group contract.

The limiting list as a reference

The limiting list as a reference

The equivalence of guarantees is not judged at the whim of the lending institution: it is based on a restrictive list of 26 criteria decreed by the Advisory Committee on the Financial Sector (CCSF). There are 18 for borrower guarantees and 8 for the optional loss of employment guarantee. Among these criteria, the lending institution is entitled to demand 11 on DC, PTIA, ITT, IPT and IPP guarantees. And in the event that he demands the loss of employment guarantee (PE), he can demand equivalence on 4 criteria.

Several shooting windows for the borrower

Several shooting windows for the borrower

The required criteria must appear on the standardized information sheet (FSI), a document that can be used by the borrower to bring competition into play. The insurer who wishes to make a contract proposal will then only have to match the criteria required. This can be done at the time of signing the loan contract, but also at any time during the twelve months that follow as well as on each anniversary date of the mortgage.

Categories
Gay Cam Chat

Getting to Know New People Through Free Gay Cam Chat

Why companies offer free gay cam chat?

Why companies offer free gay cam chat?

There are so many companies that offer free gay cam chat for their paid members. The reason for this is because there are so many people who want to have their profiles or forums viewed. It doesn’t matter what type of person you are, if they can find you on a cam site, they are interested in meeting you.

There are many different reasons why people get into sites such as this, but it isn’t to just view their social profiles. It is all about the fact that people are looking for people to meet.

The best thing about these sites is that they offer very personal, safe and professional support. The only problem with some of these companies is that you have to pay a fee to access their service.

Although you can get access to free gay cam chat, there are many reasons why you should at least try and sign up for a paid membership. If you feel like you don’t fit the profile of someone who is a good communicator, then it could be a great way to meet someone new.

Another thing to remember when using gay cam chat is that there will always be messages that aren’t displayed because someone is being rude to someone else. While it might seem as though that’s the only way to go, there are other ways to contact each other.

Check free gay cam chat

Check free gay cam chat

Even though there are many places to find free gay cam chat, it might be a great idea to at least check out a few of them first. If you see there are some problems with the free ones, there is a chance you will get a better idea of what you are looking for in terms of a free gay cam chat.

Once you get access to a good free gay cam chat, you might be pleasantly surprised at the quality of the people who are in your chatroom. You will also find that many of them are looking for other people just like you.

With a paid membership, you will also notice a huge difference in the quality of the interaction. There will be less rejections, and you can chat as much as you want and not worry about it costing you anything.

As I mentioned before, it is easy to get into any gay chat rooms that have free members, but the difference in the quality will be noticeable. Most of the time, there is also a high rate of success when joining a gay chat room, which can save you money if you are planning on meeting some new people.

Do not choose free members

Do not choose free members

The reason you shouldn’t choose free members is that many of them won’t be able to hold their own in a good argument or tell a joke. You will get more out of a paid membership because they will know what they are talking about and be able to offer quality communication.

Also, you might find that the free members are going around to other places in search of new friends. The difference in a paid membership will save you a lot of money, but if you are a single person and just want to meet new people, then you might want to check out a free gay cam chat.

All in all, it’s easy to find a free gay cam chat, but there are many people who aren’t able to use them. As long as you use your common sense, you will be fine and you will still get to meet some new people who are into the same types of things as you are.

Loan insurance: a bill to better inform the borrower.

Martial Bourquin is intimately linked to borrower insurance, more specifically to the delegation of insurance because of the amendment to which he gave his name. Senator du Doubs is still defending a bill to promote the free choice of loan insurance, at a time when 87% of contracts are group insurance.

Loan insurance is far from trivial

Loan insurance is far from trivial

Loan insurance is the guarantee both for the bank and the borrower that the maturities of the mortgage will be honored until the end of the contract in the event of a claim (death, disability, etc.) For this, the banks offer a group contract identical to all the underwriters in order to pool risks, which can sometimes represent a third of the total cost of real estate financing. Since the Lagarde law of 2010, it is possible to take out individual loan insurance, in order to benefit from tailor-made guarantees and thus lower the cost. The Hamon law in 2014 authorized the loan insurance change at any time during the first twelve months, and the amendment Bourquin extended this possibility since 1 January 2018.

The Bourquin amendment, continuous competition

The Bourquin amendment, brought by the socialist senator and integrated into the Sapin 2 law of February 17, 2017, offers the possibility for the borrower to change to another insurance contract on the anniversary date of the signing of the mortgage contract. To be accepted by the bank, the new guarantees must offer protection similar to the group contract.

However, despite this amendment, the termination of the group contract remains little used. The advantage obtained since the 2017 law is the reduction in the tariffs applied. The senator nevertheless remains mobilized on this issue.

Clearer termination date

Clearer termination date

Re-elected to the Senate on September 24, 2017, Senator Martial Bourquin has prepared a bill “to speed up and simplify public action” which plans to improve the information given to individuals because he says it lacks readability. For this, the banks will have the obligation to enter the date of signature of the loan offer on the insurance contract and the notice in order to be used as a possible termination date.

Otherwise, the borrower may terminate his insurance at any time. In addition, they must send a standardized form free of charge summarizing the offer to the borrower within 10 days after the agreement of the mortgage. Finally, they will send every year, well before the anniversary of the contract, a reminder of the right of termination. A fine of $ 15,000 is notably provided for in the event of non-compliance with the law. This project will be voted on in April.